I so went searching back for that little superscript 1. Thank God. I'm not the only one! :-)
I think the real evil thing (for me) anyway was that the explanation for footnote one wasn't apparent unless you read footnote 3 and I wanted to figure out where superscript one was before I read footnote 3.
Re: Caught me!
on 2009-01-24 05:59 am (UTC)Thank God. I'm not the only one! :-)
I think the real evil thing (for me) anyway was that the explanation for footnote one wasn't apparent unless you read footnote 3 and I wanted to figure out where superscript one was before I read footnote 3.
Didn't I promise to stop blathering? Sorry.