*considers the term "polyamorous relationship," which kind of by definition knocks aside the possibility of any "love" being involved in any of the said "relationships"*
Hm? I must be misreading this — taken at face value, you seem to be saying that polyamorous relationships can't involve love. Obviously that's false — what are you actually saying?
no subject
on 2009-01-23 03:36 am (UTC)Hm? I must be misreading this — taken at face value, you seem to be saying that polyamorous relationships can't involve love. Obviously that's false — what are you actually saying?