sorcyress: Drawing of me as a pirate, standing in front of the Boston Citgo sign (Default)
Katarina Whimsy ([personal profile] sorcyress) wrote2006-11-02 04:12 pm
Entry tags:

Important numbers:

740a
plus
680b
plus
650c
equals
2070d

~Sor
MOOP!

a: on the critical reading
b: on the math
c: on the writing

d: combined total on the SAT's. Out of 2400. Bitchin.

[identity profile] stgreyhounds.livejournal.com 2006-11-02 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Yay! Great job!

(I'm going to have to re-learn the scoring... I took it way back in the 20th century. Ok, just barely, but still.)

[identity profile] bfudlmint.livejournal.com 2006-11-02 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
The new scoring is simple they added a new 800 point section. The confusing part is they changed the way it is scored in 1995. I think they ended up inflating the point value by about 50 points. I was trying to find a listing of percentile scores to see how many people in the U.S. Kat scored highr than. That was the one that always helped me out. But then I was the dumb guy in my group and all my friends scored higher than me. But I was still better than 85% of the country.


marcmagus: Me playing cribbage in regency attire (Default)

[personal profile] marcmagus 2006-11-02 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, the rebalancing really throws comparisons off. Especially since it's, of course, not simply a scaling upward, but rather a refitting of the curve, so the effects aren't that simple. I've heard a rumor that that wasn't the first time they rebalanced things, either.

[identity profile] kdsorceress.livejournal.com 2006-11-03 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
*grin* The scoring is just that it's out of three parts right now, instead of two. So I essentially just got a 1420, with a 650 on the third section.

~Sor